Jun. 22nd, 2014

hrj: (LHMP)
(I explain the LHMP here.)

This finished up the articles in Bennett & Froide's collection about singlewomen with an odd dichotomy in English popular opinion of the 18th century when the toxic stereotype of the unwanted and sexually frustrated Old Maid arose. In an odd way, this stereotype may have provided cover for lesbians among the unmarried precisely because it overlooked the possibility of respectable women being sexually active outside marriage. To take that taste out of all our mouths, tomorrow I have a delightful romp of an 18th century novel in which our two heroines travel all over Europe together disguised as men, while engaging in a clearly passionate relationship with each other, and finally settle down to live happily ever after together after returning to women's dress. Tuesday, we'll return to Judith Bennett for a look at the article that might well be considered the fairy godmother of this project.

* * *

Lanser, Susan S. 1999. “Singular Politics: The Rise of the British Nation and the Production of the Old Maid” in Bennett, Judith M. & Amy M. Froide eds. Singlewomen in the European Past 1250-1800. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia. ISBN 0-8122-1668-7

The rise of a virulently negative attitude toward never-married women in the 18th c. seems to have been a peculiarly English reaction. While negative attitudes toward never-married women appear earlier, the 18th c. saw an increase in hostility. This occurs in parallel with the rise of feminist literature challenging sexist and patriarchal structures, and especially questioning the benefit of marriage to women. The negative screeds against “old maids" presage modern anti-feminist venom in framing singlewomen as simultaneously sexually frustrated and undesirable to men. In contrast, feminist literature of the time was largely a product of singlewomen but avoided the question of sexual fulfillment rather thoroughly. The article provides a survey of feminist literature focusing on singlehood as a positive state, e.g., the novel Millenium Hall. Lanser suggests that the context for this hostility includes a combination of peaking singlehood rates in the late 17th c. along with the rise of a “complementary “ view of gender difference (i.e., women are not “lesser men” but a different species entirely) along with the irritation of the beginnings of feminist thought. But these factors existed across Europe and while singlehood was nowhere considered desirable, other countries did not exhibit the same derisive hostility. Lanser identifies in the English rhetoric a strong and specifically English thread of failure to reproduce as “treason” to the nation. Literary hostility to lesbianism occurs during this same period, but anti-old maid literature avoids this trope, perhaps because it would undermine the image of sexual frustration that was an inherent part of the motif.

Keywords: singlewomen lesbian hostility
hrj: (doll)
…that my "user information" indicates that 226 people list my journal as a "friend" but even in my recent burst of activity for the Lesbian Historic Motif Project, the maximum number of unique LJ-user views I've gotten on any particular day was 14. On that same day, I had 25 unique non-LJ visitors. (I plaster links to this series all over: fb, twitter.) On the average, I've had 20 unique visitors total each of the 15 days I've posted LHMP entries. This compares with an average of 29 unique visitors daily for a 10 day period in May starting with my first Kalamazoo postings (though some of the traffic at the end of that period was for several writing-related entries). The main thing that all this says to me is that if I were to move my blogging to a different platform, it would have very little impact on my readership. One of the worries I've had about, say, setting up a blog on my alpennia.com site (which is still very much in larval form) has been that I'd lose readers who couldn't be bothered to follow me over there. But the LJ stats show that the majority of my readers aren't reading my through LJ accounts. (On some days, as few as 10% of my readers are through LJ and the rate is always below 50%.)

So here's a question: is there anyone out there who is currently reading me regularly through LJ who would not be willing or able to follow me on a separate blog (presumably one with RSS capability, and where I'd be providing links in fb and twitter)? LJ has essentially lost its usefulness as a community-building or community-maintaining tool. I suspect a lot of those 200+ accounts still listed as following me are leftovers from people who have long since drifted away. On the other hand, I don't see myself stopping reading my friends-list here because there are a number of very good friends who still post regularly. So I'm dithering.
hrj: (doll)
What the LJ statistics page says on the unique LJ views stat is: "This figure shows all viewers who were logged in to LiveJournal when they viewed your journal or your entries via their own Friends pages. Here, unique is defined by the visitor’s LiveJournal username." That's as much as I know about it.

To answer other concerns: No, I am absolutely not considering moving my substantive blogging to facebook. I have very deliberately kept my facebook wall private to friends-only (and I have some rather tight criteria for who I friend on facebook) which would not be compatible with doing public blogging there. (I do post links to my LJ regularly on both my facebook wall and my public author page because I know there are people over there who don't have LJ accounts.) And as several people pointed out, it' absurd to even consider doing substantive blogging on Twitter.

What I am thinking about doing is setting up a blog on my alpennia.com website (which is rather content-poor currently) to help drive traffic there, particularly since so much of my blogging is writing-related these days. It would definitely have to be using an interface that allowed easy commenting and no "must have this particular social media account to comment." Bonus for easy mirroring (or at least breadcrumb-trail-leaving) on LJ and Dreamwidth. (Did you know I have a Dreamwidth account? Of course not, because I never use it because it's too much work to dual-post.) The main reason for moving would be to integrate my writing website with my blogging as a "branding" thing.

Nothing will happen in the immediate future. Just considering options and looking at up and down sides.

Profile

hrj: (Default)
hrj

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 234567
8 91011121314
1516 1718192021
222324 25 262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 03:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios