Pondering on ethics
Aug. 10th, 2007 09:02 pmSo yesterday evening I was doing my beginning-of-the-month accounts (reconciling the checkbook, writing out the monthly bills, reconciling receipts against the charge card bills) and discovered that a couple of credit card charges that should have come through on the June bill hadn't come through on the July bill either. One was from the books-on-tape store that went out of business back in May (for an item I bought at their closing sale), so it may not be surprising that a charge got lost in the shuffle. Their business phone is disconnected now and I have no idea if I'll be able to track anyone down to inquire about the charge. The other was from Sur la Table, which is just a block off of my regular lunchtime bike ride, so I stopped in to show them the receipt and inquire about the problem.
It's not like this is unusual for me, but it tends to get the weirdest reactions. During the interactions with the store clerk, I offered a succession of explanations, starting with the most important and eventually ending up with the most trivial.
"Because it's the right thing to do." [incomprehension]
"Because there's no such thing as 'free' -- I can pay for it now or I can pay for it later in increased store prices or the loss of a place I like to shop if it goes out of business." [further incomprehension]
"Because it's fun to mess with people's minds by being agressively honest." [smile and shrug]
"Because it screws up my financial records." [dawning comprehension and approval]
Why is it so hard to get people to believe that you've done the right thing simply because it's the right thing? Because you want to help create a collective reality in which that's just what people do?
It's not like this is unusual for me, but it tends to get the weirdest reactions. During the interactions with the store clerk, I offered a succession of explanations, starting with the most important and eventually ending up with the most trivial.
"Because it's the right thing to do." [incomprehension]
"Because there's no such thing as 'free' -- I can pay for it now or I can pay for it later in increased store prices or the loss of a place I like to shop if it goes out of business." [further incomprehension]
"Because it's fun to mess with people's minds by being agressively honest." [smile and shrug]
"Because it screws up my financial records." [dawning comprehension and approval]
Why is it so hard to get people to believe that you've done the right thing simply because it's the right thing? Because you want to help create a collective reality in which that's just what people do?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-11 05:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-11 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-11 05:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-11 05:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-11 05:01 pm (UTC)If I had to make a wild-ass guess about how a culture comes to such a state of suspicion (other than the basic assumption that everyone is naturally selfish and self-centered and out to get everything they can), it would come from two sources. Institutions dealing with customers and money, having come to an acceptance of the principle that financial errors that benefit the customer are a done deal and tough luck, have extrapolated that concept from the customer having a legal right to the profits of a financial error to the customer having a moral right to the profits of a financial error. (I.e., "I caught you in a mistake, so I win.") This exceptions to this being, of course, banks and the government, who will cheerfully fine you for having benefitted from their error -- in addition to retrieving the erroneous funds.
The second source of suspicion derives from a genre of confidence games that open with a similar scenario -- i.e., you win someone's trust by appearing to be overly honest, then when they have performed some financial action to "match" your honesty, you take off with the goods. (There's a classic one involving "found money" that the con man offers to share with the mark -- the mark is induced in some manner to put up matching funds then is given the money to hold while the con man disappears to make arrangements ... only there's been some sleight of hand and the mark is actually holding a wallet full of blank paper.)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-11 06:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-11 06:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-11 10:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-11 05:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-11 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-11 02:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-11 05:11 pm (UTC)"There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch (tm). Any discount you're offering me has to come from somewhere. This means that either I'm converting an overt cash register payment into a hidden payment of some kind, or it means that someone else is paying more in order that I can pay less. Neither of these is a system I choose to participate in. When I get value for something, I like to know exactly what the other person is getting in exchange, when, and why."
The incomprehension at "it's the right thing to do" is nothing to the incomprehension at TANSTAAFL. Clerks are, however, quite cheerful about accepting, "Customer discount cards are too much hassle to keep track of and they make my wallet too fat." The problem is, that isn't my objection.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-18 12:30 am (UTC)What they're offering is to not overcharge you, in return for letting them track your purchase info and stuff more easily. It's sort of like blackmail run backwards or something. (But I think the real reasons for it are more for dressing up their usual prices as "special sale prices" rather than for the purchase tracking, really.)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-11 03:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-11 05:15 pm (UTC)Perhaps the level of corruption that has always existed at the highest levels of American society has finally percolated nearly to the lowest? (I say "nearly" because I still encounter striking levels of honesty among very poor people.)
Seriously, this is pervasive, and I doubt very much that it has a single cause, or even multiple causes that can be identified.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-11 07:21 pm (UTC)When the mistakes that people make are upwards of $10 they're usually quite grateful when I give them their money back, but in the smaller numbers they seem to tend towards annoyance at having to open the till again.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-11 08:33 pm (UTC)When I observed other cashiers handling it, and the bemused younger ones seemed to have Not Clue One, I would frequently step in and send the person to the back. I was disappointed when the older, 35-years-of-service plus woman would act suspicious of the customer. She had seen every con on the book, tho, so I imagine she was very battle-hardened at that point.
The general opinion seemed to be that since we charged 28% on our credit cards, we should let the customer get away with it. Sigh.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 12:26 am (UTC)If honesty was really the best policy in the cashier's mind I would receive a smile and a thank you. If I am in a small business their reaction is likely to be appreciative, but in a chain store they just don't seem to care about taking care of the company they work for. At least, that is my interpretation of the interaction.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 02:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 03:50 am (UTC)