hrj: (Default)
[personal profile] hrj
The last several quakes I've felt have been centered very locally, so I was guessing that this one was maybe around a 3 -- just enough to make the bookshelves creak slightly. But evidently it was a 5-something down in the South Bay. The anecdotal commentary so far suggests the local effects were really variable. Perhaps some odd propagation patterns?

Date: 2007-10-31 04:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] albionwood.livejournal.com
Forgot to mention - there's a way to tell whether you are feeling a small quake centered nearby, or a larger quake with a distant epicenter. The first shock waves (P- and S-waves) emitted from a quake travel in a straight line; they have a sort of rapid, "buzzy" feel, very sharp. After that come the Rayleigh waves, which travel more slowly around the surface of the Earth - so the more distant a quake is, the longer the time lag before you feel them. If the epicenter is nearby, you won't feel any time lag at all, and probably won't feel the difference between the two sets of waves - just one period of shaking. If you feel an early jolt followed by gradually increasing shaking, it's likely the epicenter is distant and the quake is large. (If you're too far away you won't feel those early waves at all, only the later surface waves.)

In the aforementioned Loma Prieta quake, the initial jolt felt much like a small quake on the nearby Hayward Fault; but when the rocking motion started up a few seconds later, I knew it was a big quake.

Date: 2007-10-31 04:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] patsmor.livejournal.com
Thanks for that description -- it was very helpful.

What constitutes "distant?" 15 miles? 150?

Date: 2007-10-31 05:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] albionwood.livejournal.com
Hmm, good question. It has to be far enough that the difference in travel time for the waves is noticeable. Loma Prieta was, what, about 70 miles from Emeryville? I doubt you could generally feel the difference at distances of less than 30 miles or so. But this quote from a Chron article pretty well describes what I'm talking about:
"First there was some up-and-down shaking, and then it went side-to-side, but it was nothing like '89,"
and he was in SJ, about 25 miles from the epicenter.

Date: 2007-10-31 05:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] patsmor.livejournal.com
That's good to know, and it explains what I felt -- first a sharp jolty motion, and then a side-to-side, almostly hammock-y. I'm in Mountain View now, and the calculator on the USGS service says that put me about 18 miles from the epicenter (31 km).

Date: 2007-10-31 06:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hrj.livejournal.com
Whereas I didn't feel any jolt -- just a subtly growing creaking/shaking with a second pulse of that just as it was dying down. (I was amused to have that last observation validated by other people describing a secondary "pulse" right at the end.) I have the advantage of not being on landfill (just barely -- the filled area is the west side of the railroad tracks, which is only about 4 blocks away).

Date: 2007-10-31 10:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] patsmor.livejournal.com
I felt the last "pulse" before the end, too. It was what made me wonder if I should get out of bed and do something more active about my situation ;-)

I know my neighbors' upstairs had something fall -- I heard it go over.

Of course, all the folks at work who lived nearer the epicenter had much more energetic stories to tell today.

Profile

hrj: (Default)
hrj

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 234567
8 91011121314
1516 1718192021
222324 25 262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 27th, 2025 01:41 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios