hrj: (Default)
[personal profile] hrj
Yay for the California State Supreme Court.

Still working on the whole finding-the-woman-of-my-dreams side of the equation.

Date: 2008-05-15 07:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goldenstag.livejournal.com
Nice that they show a bit of sense. I haven't read about the whole ruling, but it came across in the news as I was coming home from the school this morning. Very cool. Hope it stands up and the US Supreme Court doesn't try to stomp on it ...

Date: 2008-05-15 08:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dr-zrfq.livejournal.com
I think SCOTUS will leave it alone. The most I expect is a case in the next four years to deal with issues arising from a couple from CA, MA, VT, NJ, NH, CT, or a foreign country, traveling in a state that considers their marriage (or civil union) illegal.
Edited Date: 2008-05-15 08:53 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-05-16 12:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goldenstag.livejournal.com
Okay. I don't really pay TOO much attention to all the details, but it is certainly good news for our friends who are gay.

Date: 2008-05-15 10:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cryptocosm.livejournal.com
The US Supreme Court shouldn't be able to touch it - and may not even want to. The decision is expressly based on interpretation of the California state constitution, not the US constitution. There's also a tradition of deferring family issues to the states, and support for that has generally been strongest among those whose view of the family is narrowest.

Date: 2008-05-16 12:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goldenstag.livejournal.com
Ah. Well, not having studied these things ... <g> I am glad for those whom it affects, though. It's about freakin' time.

Profile

hrj: (Default)
hrj

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
141516171819 20
21 22 23 2425 2627
282930 31   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 2nd, 2026 04:16 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios