hrj: (Default)
[personal profile] hrj
I dropped by BayCon for the day yesterday to have some hanging-out time with [livejournal.com profile] scotica and take receipt of her feedback on Daughter of Mystery. One of the most concrete useful pieces of feedback I got, given that one of her functions was as a "target readership Subject Matter Expert", was that she ended up being late to work in order to finish reading it. Ah, the things that warm a writer's heart!

I think I'm now ready to begin the second serious revision pass. (Still have two test-readers to check in, but I'm confident I won't need any massive changes based on their input.) So in addition to all the specific notes and comments I've received, I've set up a new chapter-spreadsheet with the specific editing/revision topics I know I need to work on. If more topics come to me as I progress, I can add them to the spreadsheet and know which parts I've already covered and which ones I need to go back and do. Over-organization FTW. Checklist items so far:

Content: More casual reference to ordinary everyday religious practice, not just the mystery-related aspects. Since I'm using actual saints (slightly disguised) in the mystery ceremonies, make more concrete references to their stories/attributes that indicate why I'm using them. More regular background reminders of the developing romance.

Structure: Verify/adjust the consistency of viewpoint focus (I sometimes slip in the tightness of the third person). Review for regular distribution of visual/sensory description; watch out for talking-heads scenes. Review clarity of interpersonal reference, especially when using it to reflect viewpoint attitude.

Mechanics: Verify consistency of spelling of proper names. (Some of them changed during the writing process.) Adjust proper use of commas, hyphens, semi-colons, and m-dashes. Correct spacing around these and between sentences. (When composing on the iPad, the short-cut for a period is a double-space, but what this gets auto-converted to is a period and a single space.) Correct or at least standardize capitalization of key elements, especially noble titles. Check for consistency around smart-quotes/apostrophes. (Hmm, must check what the industry standard is these days for submissions. I know the rules for electronic submissions have shifted requirements more towards the WYSIWYG side, and I suppose there are some details I should only worry about when I get to the point of sending it out to specific markets.)

I'm sure I'll think of a few other things.

Date: 2012-05-27 05:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hrj.livejournal.com
Hmm. Evidently I'm totally behind the times. Nobody uses double spaces at the end of a sentence any more. (Except for my employer's technical writing style guide. Which means nothing because, not having an actual technical writing group, we're lucky if the people preparing and editing our documents can write in complete sentences with plausible spelling.) How have I managed to miss this revolution? In any event, it turns the issue into a simple search-and-replace task.
From: [identity profile] abd07.livejournal.com
I learned to type in secretarial school in the 60s, and I am absolutely unable to stop putting a double space after a period. I have read many Internet screeds about what a terrible thing this is, but I can't stop!! (And so far at least, no one who reads my stuff seems to care.)
There's a wonderful blog called "The Subversive Copy Editor," from someone who works for the Chicago Manual of Style, and this entry has a lot of interesting comments on the post-period double space (mostly, they're against it):
http://www.subversivecopyeditor.com/blog/2010/07/advice-for-writers-preparing-your-emanuscript.html

Date: 2012-05-29 01:56 am (UTC)
ext_143250: 1911 Mystery lady (Mystery)
From: [identity profile] xrian.livejournal.com
Yeah, the need to double space after a period was an artifact of the limitations of typewriter fonts. Fonts that are not "monospaced" (all letters the same width) don't need it. Two spaces after a period is now a "zombie rule", I.e. long dead but some people insist it has to be correct because That's What They Learned In School.

(No intent to cast aspersions on people who do it out of long habit or people who simply don't consider it important. It's not. But I'm an editor, so I fix it. It's the people who INSIST it's the only correct way who annoy me.)

Profile

hrj: (Default)
hrj

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
141516171819 20
21 22 23 2425 2627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 29th, 2025 09:45 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios