On my website, I've put together a raw list of publications that I have identified as potentially relevant to the Project. Some of these I own but haven't had a chance to review yet. Some have been mined from the citations and bibliographies of other publications. (And I've mined only a minority of the 100+ publications covered to date.) There is a wide range of relevance and reliability in these works, so inclusion isn't necessarily recommendation. I also haven't had time to clean up the completeness and format of the citations in some cases. When I say "raw" list, I mean "raw".
There are a bit over 125 publications on this list. That's more than I've already covered. And that's only scratching the surface of what remains to be mined from their citations. Don't let anyone tell you that we don't know anything about lesbians in history.
There are a bit over 125 publications on this list. That's more than I've already covered. And that's only scratching the surface of what remains to be mined from their citations. Don't let anyone tell you that we don't know anything about lesbians in history.